Skip to main content

Brain Vs. Heart

As I wrote in my last post, Hippocrates was the first physician to recognize the brain as the center of conscience and intelligence. Until then, it was widely believed that the heart controlled all emotions and intellect. This theory came from the ancient Egyptians who maintained that the heart was the seat of thought and soul, and the brain was nothing more than an accessory. They believed that good deeds lightened the heart, so when one died, the God Ammut would weigh the heart and decide your fate depending on the weight. A heart that was as light as a feather was returned to life, but a heavy heart was gobbled up. It seems that this is the reason we correlate happiness and kindness with a light heart and grief with a heavy heart!

God Ammut weighing a dead man's heart in the afterlife. Image: National Geographic

The ancient Greeks had opposing views on the center of thought and emotions. Aristotle was one of the most famous proponents of the Egyptian theory that the heart controlled thought and intelligence. However, his own mentor, Plato, believed otherwise. In the discussion of a human soul. he claimed the soul, which was immortal, had three separate parts. The part responsible for rational thought, logos, was located in the brain; therefore, the brain was the true location of the divine and immortal soul.

Aristotle argued that the soul was not immortal and resided in the heart, which was directly responsible for respiration and the sustenance of life. He argued that the heart is the first organ to develop in an embryo, and turns cold upon death, hence it was the soul of the human being. It was the organ of feelings, perception, and thinking. Therefore, it was the most important organ governing human life, and the brain was simply a cooling agent to keep the heart from overheating.

Hippocrates contradicted this theory and argued that the brain was the center of thought, reason, and emotions. Later the Roman physician Galen, who was Hippocrates' follower, proved this theory by studying the effects of brain injuries on mental activity and firmly established that the brain controlled motor and sensory functions by demonstrations of nerve cutting of animals. He argued that the heart and brain were separate entities-- both equally important in life-- with the brain representing the logical soul and the heart driving the impulsive and emotional soul.

Although we now know that Hippocrates and Galen were closer to the truth about the brain, the old theory about the heart controlling emotions and thought continues to persist, at least non-scientifically. That is why we still "learn by heart" and "put our heart into something we love" and of course, when we are really sad, we have a 💔

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Origin of Neurology

As I consider majoring in neurobiology (the study of the biological mechanisms that control the nervous system) in college, I thought it would be interesting to delve into the origins of neuroscience. For hundreds of years from the ancient Egyptians to the Greeks, humans believed that the seat of intellect was the heart (which is why the ancient Egyptians went to great lengths to preserve the heart after death but discarded the brain!)    The birth of neurology began 2500 years ago with Hippocrates who pondered over the purpose and functioning of the brain, reasoning that the brain must be the organ controlling sensation simply because most sensory organs - eyes, ears, and tongue -- are located close to the brain. This was starkly different from other opinions of the time which held that the heart was the main organ that controlled everything in humans. The brain was simply thought to be a "radiator" for pumping the heart and keeping it cool.  Later, Hippocrates expanded ...

Galen

Even though Cajal is considered the father of neuroscience, his contribution came centuries after the first insights into the nervous system. As I wrote in my earlier posts, ancient doctors pondered over the nervous system, trying to understand what controlled the mind and body. Of these doctors, one that stands out is Galen, whose contribution to the understanding of the nervous system was fundamental to neuroscience. Through anatomical experiments, Galen was the first to observe and teach the functioning of nerves in the body. For these experiments, which he wasn’t shy about demonstrating to the public, Galen is regarded as the founder of experimental physiology. Galen is considered one of the most prominent and influential doctors in history, second only to Hippocrates. Galen was a staunch follower of Hippocrates and helped spread his teachings from Greece to the vast Roman Empire. Claudius Galenus, commonly know as Galen, was born in 129 AD in Pergamum in modern-day Turkey to a...

The Nervous System

Just as the purpose of the brain and the heart confused ancient scientists, so did the nervous system. Nerves had been identified fairly early but they proved difficult to categorize. Some thought it was similar to arteries and formed some sort of connective system for tissues. In fact, the word nerve is Greek for tendon or sinew, suggesting that it was thought to be some sort of physical connection. Despite the confusion about its exact mechanism, ancient medical practitioners seemed to understand its function. Nerves were attributed to both movement and sensation correctly, even though there were opposing views on what controlled these functions. Aristotle argued that nerves originated and were controlled by the heart, while others argued nerves were controlled by the brain. Centuries later, Galen proved that nerves emanated from the brain, scoffing at those “who know nothing of what is to be seen in dissection." Galen was the first to conclude that the spinal cord was an ...